Biosolids SPOTLIGHT

Biosolids SPOTLIGHT: A focus on the people of biosolids who work in our region

April 2025 - MABA Biosolids Spotlight 

Provided to MABA members by Bill Toffey, Effluential Synergies, LLC 

SPOTLIGHT on Two New York Plants – Watertown and Endicott

“Ingenuity, that is a good word for it,” agreed Angel French, Plant Manager of the Watertown Water Resource Recovery Facility. Unfazed by unconventional and innovative technologies, French encourages her operators and maintenance staff to apply ingenuity as a team to “make it all work” in the face of unexpected challenges. French explains, although Watertown’s WPCP is classified by NYS regulations as a large plant, with a design daily flow of 16 MGD, and an average daily flow of 10 MGD, compared to Buffalo, Syracuse and Rochester and those in metro New York, Watertown is on the small end of the spectrum.  At this size, French rotates operators across all processes, and the maintenance staff are licensed operators, fostering an ethic of teamwork that is able to apply ingenuity when new equipment stumbles on startup.

spotlight 1

This Google Earth view of the Watertown Water Resource Recovery Facility, located in the northern reach of New York State, underscores the proximity of a major recreational facility to the south, and the cake storage area converted from a former lagoon rebuilt north of the digesters.

Ingenuity enabled Watertown to pivot in 2017 when new federal Sewage Sludge Incinerator regulations compelled the city to end incineration. Because sludge ash had been disposed of at solid waste landfills, Watertown was initially able to divert from incinerators to landfill disposal of cake for its management option. Dewatering equipment at Watertown is also unusual, representing one of a handful of plants in the MABA region with plate-and-frame presses. The discipline of maintaining good solids content, targeted at 20 percent solids, for incinerator feed was no less necessary for landfill disposal.  But tipping fees drove Watertown to pivot again from landfill disposal to land application.  This pivot required it to demonstrate that processes met the Class B standards through three anaerobic digesters, operating in series to achieve minimum hydraulic retention time.  

Land application is a challenge in this far reach of New York State, as the season for application is narrow, requiring the facility to develop capacity for on-site storage over the winter.  Storage is a particularly strong challenge for Watertown, as its plant adjoins actively used trails and playfields. Winter freeze and thaw cycles do not improve the quality of biosolids cake, and odors during pile disturbance is a risk factor.  Watertown’s biosolids are used typically for feed crops for dairy herds, and fertilization of field corn is the dominant use.  Last year, Watertown paved over its old ash lagoon, which had been shut down when incineration ceased, to increase the available space to store biosolids when cold weather makes storage necessary.

Two factors with land application have French considering management options.  First, against the capital cost for a future facility for cake storage is balanced the cost of installing a biosolids dryer. A dryer would have the obvious advantage of making winter storage easier, but it would also reduce risks from odors when biosolids are moved from storage.  Second is an arising concern with PFAS, both from state regulations and political responses to PFAS in New York State that include bans on land application.  Dried biosolids could be better handled than cake through a thermal conversion technology that destroys PFAS.  

Ingenuity at Watertown is highlighted by three features of the plant’s solids handling. The features are a low-head-loss headworks bar screen, second is a biogas fueled sludge pump system, and third is a dry polymer mix system that has been optimized for Watertown’s unique plate-and frame presses. 

Hydro-Dyne Engineering is the manufacturer of bar screens recently installed on Watertown’s principal influent line. Hydro-Dyne is represented in central New York by Siewert Equipment. Watertown has deployed the Great White Center Flow Screen which is special for a design that achieves “low head loss and zero carry over” with its ¼ inch  wide bars. The screen is deeply recessed in the influent well. At the outset of its operation at Watertown, the conveyor system at the discharge chute frequently tripped. While the discharge apparatus served to concentrate and dewater the screenings, the back pressure was too great for the equipment. With the ingenuity of the operators, the discharge chute was reduced in length, thereby reducing, too, the quantity of screening moved by the conveyor.  The ¼ inch screen has significantly reduced inert materials passing through the plant, improving the entire process train and biosolids quality. French anticipates a capital improvement to install a similar screen on the second major influent line, the one coming from a diverse number of other interceptor lines serving outlying communities.

spotlight 2

The Hydro-Dyne Great White bar screen was a “game changer” for Watertown for improving treatment and biosolids quality, with images here of both downstairs influent equipment and upstairs screenings discharges.

Watertown has replaced two conventional sludge pumps with Kraft Energy Systems Model KB 130P equipment, using MAN direct drive biogas fueled engines, supplied by the Kraft Power Corporation in Syracuse, New York. Biogas from the digester complex is cleaned of siloxanes and is otherwise untreated. Sulfur is not a challenge at Watertown, as the use of ferric for phosphorus removal also captures sulfides.  During normal plant operations (i.e., not wet weather) one biogas fueled engine will pump 100% of plant influent flow.  The use of biogas in this part of the plant provides for consistent biogas demand across the year, in contrast to use of biogas to meet heat demand of boilers and digesters.

spotlight 3

MAN direct drive biogas engines, supplied and installed by Kraft Power in Syracuse, are close to overcoming start up challenges, and promise soon to fully meet pumping requirements on biogas during normal flows.

But installation of the engines has had its challenges. French remarks: “any new equipment at a facility has its “bugs” that need to be worked out.”   At the outset of installation, controls which set variable pump speeds to the level of sludge in the tanks, were not properly calibrated. French and the control experts at Kraft puzzled over the challenge. French says: “once the controls were fine tuned for our facility, they worked amazing.  …it was a Wednesday, the day before Thanksgiving, a four-day weekend.  The control system company FINALLY figured it out.  The relief I had walking out the door that day knowing the pumps would respond as they were designed was unimaginable.”   One problem remains.  Premature wear of the engine valve trains has been experienced. Frank Scalise, Sales Manager for Combined Heat & Power Systems at Kraft Power, explains that the MAN factory has a new lifter arrangement that ought to improve the situation.

Watertown’s plate-and-frame presses may seem anachronistic in today’s use of specialized presses and centrifuges, but Watertown intends to stay with them. The presses were manufactured in 1981 by Edward and Jones and were installed by engineering company Stearns & Wheler Engineers.  Initial reasoning for utilizing plate and frame press was its ability to achieve higher percent solids for incineration.  But the presses meet the needs for preparing biosolids for land application, though they do require close attention. Fabric filters are changed at least annually, and cast iron filter press plates have been replaced with composites.  A principal focus for good control of dewatering is constant adjustment of polymer dosages. Dry polymer, delivered in 55-pound bags, is mixed carefully to deliver a 0.25% solution that meets a homegrown “swinging the bucket” test for an effective dosage. If too much polymer is used, the cake becomes sticky and does not fall onto the conveyor when plates are released.  The presses operate one shift, five days weekly, though in the Spring and Fall, when small agencies in its wastewater shed clear out their basins, a second shift or a second day of dewatering can be added.  The easy start and stop of this dewatering system provides good flexibility.  Looking to the future, French conjectures that a change to dewatering equipment would be on top of the plate and frame, rather than a replacement for it.

spotlight 4

Now over four decades old, Watertown’s plate-and-frame presses operate well when given special attention to polymer dosage and annual replacement of filters.

As French and her staff look for new ideas and new ways of solids handling, they are taking cues from other agencies, and one such agency is the treatment plant serving Village of Endicott, New York, led by a similarly ingenious plant manager, Philip Grayson. The Mid Atlantic Biosolids Association held its Summer Technical Symposium in Endicott in 2023, and Grayson’s plant was the destination for the tour on the second morning.

spotlight 5

Endicott Water Pollution Control Plant, in the southern tier of New York, has enjoyed loyal compost customers in the past, and is building a market for its new biosolids product.

At the time of the Symposium, Grayson was already winding down the plant’s composting operation.  The Village began in 1985 the composting of biosolids with a Taulman-Weiss in-vessel system and after 20 years of operations, it had added windrow composting to ensure complete stabilization.  To reduce costs while still producing a Class A EQ product, the Village moved to biosolids drying, selecting a Gryphon Environmental’s single-pass belt dryer.  As an early adopter of this technology in the MABA region, Grayson relied on the collaborative culture at Gryphon to be a team that together could meet challenges with ingenuity. One notable area were changes to the method of conditioning the feed material to the dryer belt. Gryphon previously only handled aerobically digested and not anaerobically digested material. The differences between how those two dewatered cakes are significant and created operational challenges. In addition, occasionally Endicott had issues with blinding of the inlet screens with human hair and other fibers. These two issues led to Endicott installing a Gryphon system that uses blades to shred the feed.

spotlight 6

Endicott is an “early adopter” of Gryphon Environmental’s single pass belt dryer and has already fitted a new 10 foot module to expand processing capacity by 25 percent. 

Hair and fiber are seldom a focus of attention at biosolids conferences, giving rise to the kind of challenge Gryphon has had with its dryer feeding system, one that requires ingenuity in a solution.  Josh DeArmond, Gryphon’s Director of Engineering, says that a frequently invoked motto at Gryphon is: “This is NOT our fault, but it IS our problem.” In the brainstorming of solutions to a blinding by fibers of the dryer feed system, the term “harrow” was borrowed from the agricultural industry to describe a system of star-like blades for cutting through the fibers in the dryer feed. The company has this as a patent pending solution. 

The second area was ensuring adequate drying time by extending the belt with an additional ten-foot module. During the early stages of dryer operation, Grayson determined that having flexibility in managing solids flows and in ensuring steady compliance with time/temperature standards warranted an additional dryer module, a fifth 10 foot drying section and a new longer belt, adding 25% to processing capacity. The challenge was fitting the new unit into a building with narrow aisles and limited dimensions. Endicott’s staff was able to shift the location of the belt filter press and conveyor, and Gryphon modified its modules construction to allow the staff to squeeze the unit in place.  Ingenuity and collaboration enabled Endicott and Gryphon to together accomplish results that met the unexpected challenges of the moment. 

Endicott shares several key features with French’s Watertown facility in size (Endicott serves 50,000 customers), in its anaerobic digesters and in having process equipment that utilizes the biogas. But a key common concern is the vulnerability of its planned, long-term recycling program to changes in state regulations of land application, largely a consequence of the global issue of PFAS.  Gryphon Environmental’s motto applies here: PFAS is not our fault, but it is our problem.  While neither agency sees a problem with results of biosolids testing for PFAS undertaken at NYS DEC’s direction, both are concerned with the potential endpoint of current political and regulatory reaction to PFAS, which may yet throw the entire recycling pathway for biosolids into question. One area of concern is that, even with a final resolution of PFAS standards in their favor, both agencies rely on willing farm customers to take their biosolids. Farmers may become wary of accepting biosolids even when their sources are better than regulatory limits, and companies servicing the farmers face emerging acceptance obstacles and challenges from local officials.  This situation underscores Endicott’s interest in diversifying its outlets for dried biosolids, and in Watertown’s interest in embarking on a search for a suited dryer technology. Both French and Grayson anticipate a need to have flexible outlets for biosolids, a need that requires the ingenuity that has guided investments in each agency’s processes over the past decade.  And both will have the teams within their facilities and with their equipment suppliers to meet future challenges. 

Watertown and Endicott exemplify the power of teamwork to meet challenges with ingenuity.

For more information, contact Mary Baker at [email protected] or 845-901-7905.

 

March 2025 - MABA Biosolids Spotlight 

Provided to MABA members by Bill Toffey, Effluential Synergies, LLC 

SPOTLIGHT on Dr. Linda S. Lee and Her Research Group

“Go slow on the regulations. Go fast on the research.”  

This is Dr. Linda Lee’s consistent message to regulators, policymakers, business leaders and agency employees, and to the public. One of her PFAS anecdotes is the failure of the Air Force to address the widespread detection of PFAS in groundwater at a military site when first brought to their attention. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, were intentionally put in aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) in the 1960s to facilitate extinguishing hydrocarbon fires fast. At the time, Dr. Lee explains, PFAS compounds were not understood to persist nor that they could lead to adverse health effects. Slow response to their presence has led to decades of continued discharge of a class of recalcitrant fluorinated compounds during firefighting training at hundreds of military bases as well as airports, which has contributed to much of the widespread contamination we currently face. Dr. Lee has witnessed how this has been followed now by numerous regulations, sparking expensive actions and existential threats to many corners of society, no less to the corner biosolids practitioners inhabit. Dr. Lee uses this story to remind audiences, also, to be wary of quick substitute formulations not yet subjected to research, which in time may show up as hazardous.

Dr. Linda S. Lee is a Distinguished Professor of Agronomy at Purdue University, with a joint appointment in Environmental & Ecological Engineering (EEE). Renowned nationally and internationally, Dr. Lee is a leading authority on environmental chemistry, focusing particularly on the fate and exposure aspects of contaminants, with a significant emphasis on per- and poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals (PFAS) over the past two decades.  Her contributions to environmental chemistry and PFAS research have positioned her as a key figure in addressing pressing environmental challenges.

spotlight 1

Linda S Lee, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Agronomy at Purdue University

Dr. Lee’s work is characterized by a commitment to bridge the gap between scientific research and practical application. She excels in conducting both laboratory and field-scale studies that directly address stakeholder needs, translating complex scientific findings into actionable strategies for regulatory agencies, environmental managers, farmers, and homeowners. Her dedication to stakeholder engagement is evident in her active participation in congressional briefings, her support for farmers navigating PFAS-impacted agriculture, and her work with regulatory bodies.

A strong advocate for collaboration, Dr. Lee encourages interdisciplinary research, fostering partnerships across various fields, including human health effects, ecotoxicity, and green manufacturing. Her extensive publication record, comprising nearly 200 papers within top environmental chemistry journals, underscores her significant contributions to the field. Her earlier research encompassed polyaromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, antibiotics, hormones, and metalloids. Dr. Lee holds a few patents related to environmental remediation technologies.   

Her research program is driven by user-inspired challenges. This brought her to focus on PFAS and unregulated organic chemical (UOC) fate, mitigation, and remediation in various systems. Dr. Lee's group was among the first in the U.S. to focus on PFAS behavior, beginning in the mid-2000s. Her work has been instrumental in understanding PFAS environmental occurrence, soil affinity, and microbial degradation. She developed and optimized analytical tools for detecting PFAS at increasingly lower concentrations, contributing to a deeper understanding of PFAS transport and transformation.  Her early research revealed the role of PFAS structure in solubility and sorption and microbial transformation of precursor PFAS that can lead to PFOA and PFOS. These findings were among those that informed EPA's efforts to reduce fluorotelomer alcohol residuals and to phase out bioaccumulative long-chain PFAS. Her biotransformation studies also highlighted the challenge for bioremediation strategies to exacerbate PFAS issues.  Her research has since moved from lab-based to field-based studies and with projects, and looking beyond PFAS, as her current research projects include EPA-funded research grant to the Water Research Foundation: Unregulated Organic Chemicals in Biosolids: Prioritization, Fate and Risk Evaluation for Land Applications and collaborating on a SERDP-funded project assessing ecotoxicity of PFAS alternatives.

spotlight 2

Field sampling a watershed for PFAS with Dr. Lee in the background supervising her graduate students

Dr. Lee's extensive speaking engagement includes 58 invited talks in the past four years, addressing diverse stakeholder groups. She has delivered keynote addresses at conferences, contributed to NAS initiatives, and advised on regional biosolids studies and EPA panels. She has also advised the State of California on PFAS regulations and pesticide total maximum daily load limits.  She has participated in high-level workshops, including the 2024 USDA workshop on PFAS in agriculture and food systems, and serves on the NAS Committee assisting the USDA in addressing PFAS on agricultural land.  She has presented to diverse audiences, including the Products Stewardship Society and the Wastewater Engineers and Technology Trade (WWETT) Conference, providing critical insights into PFAS regulations and challenges. 

Dr. Lee's research has had tangible impacts on environmental policy and agricultural practices. Her work extends to empowering local emergency planning committees and facilitating discussions on urban soil quality. Her research on PFAS in fast-food packaging influenced legislation in Washington and California, contributing to the phase-out of PFAS use in packaging materials and other consumer products.  Notably, her team's work on hormones in manure led the EPA to a science-based decision against regulating manure applications as a means of controlling natural hormones in the waterways, preventing significant financial burdens on the farming community. Furthermore, her research has enabled farmers to reduce PFAS in food and feed products while maintaining economic viability.   

Education and mentorship are central to Dr. Lee's mission. She has mentored 44 students, with a significant proportion now holding tenured faculty positions, working in chemical and pharmaceutical companies, engineering/consulting firms, and government agencies. She has developed and facilitated numerous educational programs, demonstrating her dedication to enhancing student success. Most of Dr. Lee’s science journal publications have authors from within her group who are PhD students and post docs, as exemplified in these eight 2024 and 2025 papers to date:

Biosolids practitioners can look forward to these early-career scientists who are lead authors of these papers to be the next generation guiding us through the current PFAS challenge and importantly going on to study “unregulated organic compounds.”  Her group was the cover story in CSA News in November 2022: When Chemicals Go to the Dark Side: The Unintended Consequences of Emerging Contaminants.

spotlight 3

The cover of the November 2022 CSA News (the monthly magazine of the tri-societies Crop Science, Soil Science and Agronomy) with two graduate students Lynda Peter and Ariana Lazo taking water samples for PFAS 

The current graduate students, post docs and analytical chemist include Lynda Peter, Elijah Openiyi, Ariana Lazo, Angelly Zharick Guarin, Sage Saccomanno, Michelle Yam, Collen Geib, Caroline Alukkal, Rodrigo Alvarez-Ruiz, Jun Duan, Maria Jose Rodriguez Pascual, Bie Yang, and Youn Choi. Her research also includes several undergraduate research assistants. Lee says, “The work we do takes an army!” Here are snapshots of some of Dr. Lee’s PFAS “soldiers.”

spotlight 4

Lynda Godwin Peter picture from Purdue University’s spotlight on graduate ag researchers.

Lynda Godwin Peter's Nigerian upbringing, steeped in both science and humanities, fueled her passion for environmental research. She earned her environmental science degree from the University of Benin, focusing on soil science, driven by Nigeria's water contamination challenges. Her master's at Tennessee State University explored heavy metal remediation. Discovering Dr. Linda Lee's work on PFAS at Purdue University, she joined the lab in 2020. Peter was featured in a Purdue “spotlight” on graduate ag research in January 2025 for her PhD research investigation into PFAS, and she is the central image on the cover of the CSA News magazine.  Her focus on PFAS is its movement from biosolids in soil to water sources, quantifying long-term risks using field studies, lab analysis, and modeling. Utilizing advanced instrumentation, she measures PFAS at parts-per-trillion levels, addressing their toxic effects. Peter actively contributes beyond research, representing Purdue's agronomy department in the Graduate Student Senate and serving on the Ag Alumni Board. She has presented at international conferences, published her findings, and mentored undergraduates. As she completes her PhD, Peter aims for a postdoctoral position in PFAS research, aspiring to a faculty role. Outside academia, she pursues gardening, running, drawing, and baking, finding parallels between pie-making and chemistry.

spotlight 5

Youn Choi, PhD and Post Doc

Youn Choi is a PhD graduate of Dr. Lee’s group as well, who came back to fill the Analytical Chemist position in her group. Choi has been instrumental to Dr. Lee for enabling her to collaborate with so many groups. She has become an expert in PFAS analytical methods for various media, and particularly in non-target analysis with high resolution mass spectrophotometry.  Dr. Lee says of Choi, “she is my eyes, hands and feet in the daily supervision and mentoring within the lab. She is amazing and does not get enough credit where credit is due. She is instrumental in much of what we are able to do, including a key to supporting much of the PFAS adverse human and biota health effects we serve as collaborators!” 

spotlight 6

Caroline Rose Alukkal, PhD and Post Doc

Caroline Rose Alukkal is a Ph.D. scholar in Interdisciplinary Ecological Science & Engineering with the department of Environmental and Ecological Engineering.  With a bachelor's degree in biotechnology engineering and a master's degree in environmental science and engineering, she possesses a diverse wealth of expertise to understand environmental challenges and respond with innovative solutions. Currently, her focus is on quantifying PFAS, with a primary emphasis on wastewater resource recovery facilities (WWRFs) and biosolids for their sustainable management. Alukkal is developing analytical tools for the unknown fluorinated precursors.  She is actively involved in research on technologies for remediate PFAS risk in soils.  Her happiness is rooted in enhancing the quality of the environment and in educating others about its importance.

spotlight 7

Elijah Openiyi – Graduate Research Assistant

Elijah Openiyi is a Graduate Research Assistant at Purdue University Interdisciplinary Ecological Science & Engineering program and Agronomy department. As a child raised in the developing country of Nigeria, in the West African region, he grew up seeing unaddressed environmental pollutants and problems. This sparked his interest in the world of science as a potential solution; thus, he earned a bachelor’s and master’s degree in chemistry with emphasis on environmental chemistry research. His current research focuses on the occurrence, fate, transport, and mitigation strategies of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and other Unregulated Organic Contaminants (UOCs) in agricultural processes. The beneficial and sustainable use of biosolids, biochar and water treatment residuals (WTRs) in agricultural processes are currently the focus of his research. His mantra: keep the earth green.

spotlight 8

Ariana Lazo – Second year PhD student

Ariana Lazo is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Ecological Sciences and Engineering Interdisciplinary program and is housed in the Department of Agronomy. Raised in Pharr, Texas, Ariana graduated in 2022 with her bachelor's degree in plant and environmental soil science from Texas A&M University.  She is interested in understanding the fate and transport behavior of Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in agricultural systems.  She is studying plant uptake, showing that soybeans can be cultivated on PFAS contaminated land, as PFAS does not translocate to the bean, and her study is expected to be published late in 2025. 

The credentials of these young researchers and the focus given to their work by Dr. Linda Lee confirm the group ‘s commitment to bridging scientific research and practical application, and to “doing it fast.”  

All biosolids practitioners owe a debt of gratitude for the intelligence and energy of their scientific inquiry and all that it may mean to the direction of regulations and public investments that lay ahead.

For more information, contact Mary Baker at [email protected] or 845-901-7905.

 

February 2025 - MABA Biosolids Spotlight 

Provided to MABA members by Bill Toffey, Effluential Synergies, LLC 

SPOTLIGHT on the UAJA Biosolids Project

For now, at least, it is simply called the “Biosolids Project.”  But by any standard, the comprehensive set of treatment innovations underway in State College, Pennsylvania, deserves superlatives.  This “project includes advanced digester, dryers, food waste receiving, and biogas recycling, meeting every definition of The Utility of the Future Today or that of a Circular Water Economy facility, definitions that catch global attention among water leaders and that call to mind large, well-known projects in Los Angeles, Milwaukee, and Raleigh.  The project includes descriptors that feature “energy,” as in facilities described in previous MABA SPOTLIGHTS, such as the WSSC Water’s Piscataway Bioenergy Facility, Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority’s food waste augmentation project and DC Water’s Bloom product and Bailey Bioenergy Facility. But these are facilities with large service areas, not the modest base of 14,000 connections of UAJA. Indeed, UAJA can expect its “biosolids project” will catch wide attention for being so clearly a template for hundreds of comparatively small public agencies across the country.

The University Area Joint Authority (UAJA) provides wastewater treatment and biosolids management services for State College, Pennsylvania, and much of the surrounding Centre County region. Under the leadership of executive director Cory Miller and a supportive, engaged board of 10 trustees, the UAJA has embraced sustainability, has a forward-thinking approach to watershed management and takes a leadership role in biosolids management.

spotlight 1

Aerial view of UAJA showing, in the upper part of the frame the composting building which was removed in 2024 for construction of the “biosolids project.” 

Recognizing that UAJA’s composting infrastructure was nearing its useful life, yet remaining committed to making an exceptional quality product for soils in the community and the region, UAJA undertook a comprehensive planning study for biosolids treatment options.  Miller and his board looked to an expanded role for UAJA as a regional organic processing facility, building on the base of a daily flow averaging 5.3 million gallons and an annual biosolids production of 2,400 dry metric tons. Considering as an option taking in wastewater solids and organic wastes from a wider region, the UAJA saw that it could better fulfill its role supporting economic and community development as well as good environmental quality.  

Results of this decade-long visioning and planning has been “solid,” with UAJA embarking on a showcase bioenergy facility. The progress on this project was recently reported by the local newspaper, the Centre Daily Times: “An $81M project underway at UAJA will turn waste into renewable energy. Here’s how.” 

Miller frames the case for the UAJA transformation in this way: “Eighty-one million dollars may be a scary number, but the Authority concluded the new plan is the best alternative for the community. It is affordable, based on revenue bonds supported by the rate payers of the system.  In Pennsylvania, being on the leading edge means doing things without grant money.  The compost facility was a game changer in its day but after nearly 30 years, it was all spent.”  

The UAJA bioenergy vision has multiple features.  The vision for solids is high-rate digesters for wastewater solids and food waste, biogas collection and treatment to pipeline quality, biosolids dryers with capacity to serve as a regional facility, and an excellent soil product that satisfies the demand of long-standing compost customers.  No small part of the program is revenue from accepting food waste and digested solids from nearby agencies, but also added to the pro forma is sale of digester gas supplied to the nearby gas pipeline, biogas which commands a high price when cleaned to natural gas standards.

spotlight 2a

spotlight 2b

spotlight 2c

This set of photographs is from a Centre Daily Times article of “An $81M project underway at UAJA will turn waste into renewable energy. Here’s how” (12/12/2024),  with pictures showing construction underway on  anaerobic digesters (a), food waste receiving (b), and the drying building (c)

Revenue from tipping fees for food waste will in part pay the way for the capital costs in the receiving and processing facilities.  The tipping fee set by UAJA for food waste disposal is set by the marketplace, as it is an incidental operation to wastewater treatment, which otherwise has a publicly set uniform rate for wastewater disposal  This gives UAJA flexibility in its revenue for this operation, with daily adjustments to optimize digestion feed, to achieve microbial stability and to keep digesters at peak performance, while avoiding negatives, such as foaming.   

UAJA will work closely with the Centre County Recycling and Refuse Authority.  UAJA’s facility is prepared to partner with CCRRA to reach its goal to divert organic waste collected from households in the county from landfills. UAJA anticipates developing a steady source of pre-consumer commercial sources, as from supermarkets and manufacturers.  

With the installation of the belt drying processes, UAJA will be providing regional biosolids services.  Once in operation, UAJA will be accepting digested dewatered sludges from nearby boroughs of Tyrone and Bellefonte, along with the Moshannon Valley Joint Sewer Authority in Phillipsburg. UAJA will dry the biosolids and market the product as a Class A EQ soil product, mostly as a turf grass management product. Compared to compost, which has been very popular over more than two decades, UAJA expects its dried product to be in good demand also, with less volume to manage than compost. As was the case with compost distribution, commercial users will arrange their own transportation. UAJA expects its biosolids product to go out the door with little focused marketing on the part of UAJA. Miller has already received a request from one user to purchase the entire supply.  

Miller believes the UAJA will be a role model for other communities. UAJA is a medium sized utility, with a flow rate typical of many boroughs and towns in the mid-Atlantic region.  As UAJA creates a role for itself as an organic waste processing center, it is an example of goal fulfillment for recycling often sought by local leaders, namely the reduction of organic waste disposal in landfills.   Miller advocates for public agencies engaging in master planning for biosolids:  “Master planning really doesn't cost that much, and it opens doors for long term solutions.”  

Innovative technologies motivate the UAJA staff.  Miller is committed to bringing on people who are challenged by new technology and who value continuous learning.  The world-class bioenergy facility is that kind of attractor for talented operators. UAJA’s take on “first in class” technologies is that companies with such technologies have a stake in ensuring smooth operations and in helping ensure authority staff are well-trained.

UAJA invites the community for tours of its facilities.  It has well over 1000 visitors annually, including university students.  Miller is particularly committed to tours for fifth grade students who are studying water.  UAJA is a regular field trip destination, showing the young students not only the impressive array of tanks and pumps, but the control rooms, the laboratories and machine shops as well.  He has witnessed firsthand the value of children and their parent chaperones learning of the wastewater treatment enterprise, as they are or will be future ratepayers who appreciate the value of wastewater services. He recalls early in his career one 5th grader who grew up to become an elected township supervisor in his service area.

About the role of UAJA in the State College community, Miller explains: “The game is not just sewage, but also life quality, business development, and environmental sustainability.  The mindset across the wastewater industry ought to be that we recognize what we are really doing is improving the quality of life and local economy along with enhancing the environment.”

The UAJA project has as its role model the amazing Hermitage Food Waste to Energy Facility and Wastewater Plant in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, a MABA member agency.  Tom Darby, executive director of this small agency with a big game plan, has pioneered the role that Cory Miller is undertaking.  Hermitage Borough has transformed a conventional wastewater plant into a regional processor of commercial food waste, and in so doing has become a reference facility for key equipment -- food depackagers, high solids digesters and biogas collection and clean up systems. The Hermitage facility is well described in its own brochure, and engaging YouTube video, and  professional case studies (Food Waste Co-Digestion at Hermitage Municipal Authority (PA) Business Case Analysis Snapshot).

spotlight 3

Biological hydrolysis is a key aspect of the Veolia two-step anaerobic digestion system under construction at UAJA, that can accommodate the high strength organic feedstocks from food waste and wastewater solids 

While Darby was the force behind this facility, he was aided by engineering wizard Jason Wert, senior engineer with RETTEW, of State College, Pennsylvania.  RETTEW, a MABA member, has had deep “hands on” experience with “waste to energy” at Hermitage that Wert has been able to apply to UAJA.  Wert has emphasized several key features in the design of the UAJA waste-to-energy system, informed by the Hermitage experience.  Anaerobic digestion, provided by Veolia, includes their Monsal biological hydrolysis process. This process allows for two stage digestion of the incoming wastewater solids, separating the hydrolysis and acid formation steps from methanogenesis, optimizing in the first stage for microbial destruction of complex organic matter before feeding digesters in the subsequent gas production stage. In so doing, UAJA can separately process wastewater solids and slurried food waste in separate digesters. This feature thereby enables operators to distinguish biogas derived from food waste from biogas derived from wastewater solids, a distinction that has revenue implications down the line.  This separation also allows for processing times and temperatures to reflect the inherently different digestibility of the two feedstocks.

spotlight 4

This is an aerial photograph of the Hermitage Food Waste to Energy facility at the borough wastewater plant which is a model for the project underway in State College.

One elaborate feature of the UAJA facility, compared to most municipal co-digestion operations, is the scale of the food waste processing capabilities.  Harnessing Darby’s experience at Hermitage, UAJA will be using the Veolia Excrusor Food Depackaging System, an industrial scale system more commonly deployed at commercial solid waste facilities than wastewater plants.  This equipment will allow UAJA, as with Hermitage, to accept packaged food products that require disposal, separating metal, plastic, and paper packaging from food waste, and thereby decontaminating slurried feed stock ahead of the digesters. The food waste processing area, with its enclosed food waste acceptance area, the Ecrusor and the slurry tank, is separate from the acceptance area for municipal biosolids cake.  Cake will be received by UAJA from other wastewater plants for drying in Veolia BioCon, a belt dryer system that is another element of the new solids system producing a Class A EQ product for marketing. While the current plan of operation does not include digested food waste drying, this is a possible future step.

spotlight 5

A key to the food waste receiving facility at UAJA will be the Veolia Excrusor that “depackages” commercial food waste, effectively separating organic materials from metals and plastics that are in packaging, and in use at Hermitage.

Biogas from digesters has maximum revenue potential when brought to “pipeline standards.” This is an elaborate set up for removing moisture and CO2, and for removing gaseous contaminants, notably hydrogen sulfide and siloxane, such that the biogas is transformed into Renewable Natural Gas, essentially indistinguishable chemically from its fossil-sourced gas.  

Veolia is clearly a key part of the UAJA development as UAJA is installing Veolia’s first Biological Hydrolysis system at a wastewater facility in North America .  This arises from the good track record of high solids two phase digestion at Hermitage and the success of Ecrusor equipment. But the selection of an integrated system from Veolia is in part due to the development of commercial scale biogas production facilities using Veolia equipment in the mid-Atlantic region. Veolia’s Nick Bonkoski, a MABA Board member, has for many years been an advocate and technical salesperson for the Monsal Biological Hydrolysis methods of digestion, having learned the trade from his father William Bonkoski, who spent almost 50 years in the business.  Bonkoski has seen the food waste-to-biogas industry take off over recent years. He points to two privately developed projects in the region that are under construction: Linden (New Jersey) Renewable Energy Project, the brainchild of RNG Energy Solutions, and the American Organic Energy digester project in Yaphank, New York, a project headed by Charles Vigliotti, who has provided leadership in the composting arena for decades with the Long Island Compost facility. These facilities draw upon the vast volumes of food waste generated in the New York / New Jersey metropolitan region.  But even boroughs the size of State College produce a volume of organic wastes suitable as a feedstock for anaerobic digestion. 

UAJA is in the mid-point of its solids system transformation. In Spring 2023, the last of UAJA biosolids was put through the enclosed compost system, and landscape customers worked through the final compost inventory by Summer 2024. A year ago, in January 2024, contracts were signed, and by mid-year, the compost building had been removed, and foundational work began for the dryers and waste handling areas began.  Later in 2024, construction of hydrolysis and digester units began. Much of the construction is expected to be completed by the end of 2025, with start up extending into mid-2026.  

One year from now we ought to be receiving our invitations to the opening of this state of the art digestion facility.  It will surely become the destination of choice for biosolids managers throughout the Mid Atlantic. Perhaps UAJA will have a naming contest for this facility.   The ”biosolids project” could become the “Centre Region Ecofactory for Food Waste and Wastewater Solids Transformation to Bioenergy and Biofertilizer.”  We have a year to work on this name…

For more information, contact Mary Baker at [email protected] or 845-901-7905.

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > last >>

Page 1 of 13